In the mid-18th century, Carolus Linnaeus and Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840) first began systematically to classify human races and evaluate their attributes. In the early 19th century, Georges Cuvier (1769-1832) divided the human species into three varieties: the Caucasian race, the most beautiful and progressive; the Mongolian race, the civilizations of which had stagnated; and the Ethiopian race, whose members displayed a “reduced skull” and facial features of a monkey. This last group remained “barbarian”. That the different groups of human beings could be arranged in a hierrachy from lowest to highest was, thus, a commonplace in biology, as well in the public mind. The US Constitution recognized this kind of hierarchy when it affirmed the property rights of slave holders and stipulated that resident Africans should be counted as three-fifth of a person for purposes of deciding congressional representation. (Galileo Goes to Jail, Ed. Ronald L. Numbers. 2009, p. 175)
Big Bang theory referred to as Modern “Genesis” retired the Biblical Genesis because the American social Darwinist and a New Ager John Fiske imparted to the enthusiastic audiences his conviction that the political genius of Aryan peoples was the hope of the world. Oliver Stone in his laterst documentary series "Secret History of America" is rehabilitating Hitler and Stalin as typical scape goats of public opinion. In fact, the director argues they were both products of their historical period. Let me add here that Philosopher M. Polanyi observed, “Newtonian physics and Darwin’s notion of the survival of the fittest were key elements both in the Marxist concepts of class warfare and of racial philosophies which shaped Hitlerism and scientific world view.” Logically, we may expect that another Jewish Holocaust is unavoidable and it will be a product of John Paul II's rehabilitation of Criminal “Science.”
What 'Science' meant for the early Apostles of Aryanism
In his magisterial two-volume work Modern Egypt, Lord Cromer argued that the ‘Oriental’, meaning Semites, was irredeemably childish and the diametrical opposite of ‘us’: “Sir Alfred Lyall once said to me: ‘Accuracy is abhorrent to the Oriental mind. Every Anglo-Indian school always remembers that maxim.’ Want of accuracy, which easily degenerates into untruthfulness, is in fact the main characteristic of the Oriental mind... Although the ancient Arabs acquired in a somewhat higher degree the science of dialectics, their descendants are singularly deficient in the logical faculty. They are often incapable of drawing the most obvious conclusions from any simple premises of which they may admit the truth.” (Quoted in Edward W. Said, Orientalism: Western Conceptions of the Orient New York and London, 1985. p.38)
The influential French philologist E. Renan attempted a “scientific” explanation for new racist and imperialist myths. He argued that Hebrew and Arabic were degraded languages, deviations from the Aryan tradition, which had become irredeemably flawed. These Semitic tongues could be studied only as an example of arrested development and lacked the progressive character of ‘our’ linguistic systems. That was why Jews and Arabs were both ‘une combinaison inferieure de la nature humaine: “One sees that in all things the Semitic race appears to us to be an incomplete race by virtue of its simplicity. This race – if I dare use the analogy – is to the Indo-European family what a pencil sketch is to a painting; it lacks that variety, that amplitude, that abundance of life which is the condition of perfectibility.
Renan inspired this passage in A. Hitler's Mein Kampf: “…What we see before us of human culture today, the results of art, science, and techniques, is almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan.” (…) “The Jew forms the strongest contrast to the Aryan.’’(…) “The Jewish person, with all its apparent intellectual qualities, is nevertheless without any true culture, especially without a culture of its own. For the sham culture which the Jew possesses today is the property of other peoples, and is mostly spoiled in his hands. When judging Jewry in its attitude towards the question of human culture, one has to keep before one’s eyes as an essential characteristic that there never has been and consequently that today also there is no Jewish art; that above all the two queens of all arts, architecture and music, owe nothing original to Jewry. What he achieves in the field of art is either bowdlerization or intellectual theft. With this, the Jew lacks those qualities which distinguish creatively and, with it, culturally blessed races.’
As a result of this racist attitude of the Europeans , rthe word Orintal(s) meaning Eastern(s) is often now seen as pejorative by the people it refers to, perhaps with the exception of Palestinians, who know that they will be loved because of their proximity to the Suez Canal, still an object of colonial desire.
From a Bathtube to a Littlle, Warm Pond
Until 1836 the English public had never heard of Andrew Crosse. By the end of 1837 he was reviled from one end of England to the other. He was an atheist, a blasphemer, “a reviler of our holy religion”, “a disturber of the peace of families”, a man who had presumptuously attempted to rival the God that made him. www.rexresearch.com/crosse/crosse.htm
In the year 1837 Crosse was making certain experiments upon the artificial formation of crystals by means of weak and long-continued electric currents. The insect (acari) first appeared in the course of an attempt to make crystals of silica by allowing a suitable fluid medium to seep through a piece of porous stone (oxide of iron, from Vesuvius) kept electrified by means of battery. The fluid used was a mixture of hydrochloric acid and a solution of silicate of potash.
“On the 26th day from the commencement of this experiment the appearances assumed the form of a perfect insect, standing erect on a few bristles which formed its tail. In the course of a few weeks about a hundred of them made their appearance on the stone...In a later experiment, Crosse succeeded in producing an acarus in a closed and airtight glass retort filled with an electrified solution, one wire being led in through the all of the retort and the other through a cup of mercury at its beak. The solution was a sillicate one, prepared as for the first experiment, and was put in hot. On connecting up the battery:
“An electric action commenced; oxygen and hydrogen gases were liberated; the volume of atmospheric air was soon expelled. Every care had been taken to avoid atmospheric contact and admittance of extraneous matter, and the retort itself had previously been washed with hot alcohol...”
Let me add here that in those days, i.e. when Blavatsky was propagating her ideas, electricity was considered the very essence and origin of life itself. Mme Blavatsky, the Russian-born foundress of Theosophy taught the philosophy behind Pan’s seven-piped flute as follows: “Force enough may actually be generated to create an electrical vortex, sufficiently powerful to produce many a strange phenomenon.Henry Kunrath, the greatest of the alchemists and Rosicrucians of the middle ages, has shown spirit in man, as in every atom – as a bright flame enclosed within a more or less transparent globule – which he called soul.According to Soviet poet Maiakovsky, the soul is nothing but “steam, compressed air, and electricity.” Lenin taught: Communism= Socialism+Electricity.
It is interesting to note that at the height of the Crosse furore (1837) no less an authority than Faraday stated, in a paper read at the Royal Institution, that similar appearances had presented themselves in the course of his own electrical experiments, but that he was doubtful whether they should be regarded as a case of production or revivification..
In the opinion of Dr. A.C. Oudemans of Arnhem, an authority upon acari, expressed in 1934, Crosse's were quite certainly the common Glycophagus domesticus, which is very tenacious of life and capable of getting into tins which appear to be hermetically sealed. (Rupert T. Gould Crosse's Acari in his book Oddities. A Book of Unexplained facts. 1965). There was no Pasteur in England at that time.
The last sentence of The Origin of Species, first edition, 1859: "There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved."
But this sentence of all the editions of his magnum opus bar the first was corrected to read:
"There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved."
It was the version of the first edition which inspired A. Hitler's belief: “Ultimate wisdom consists in understanding the instinctive causes – that is: a man must never fall into the madness of believing that he has really risen to be lord and master over Nature – which is so easily induced by the conceit of half-education – but must understand the fundamental necessity of Nature's rule, and realize how much his existence is subject to these laws of eternal combat and upward struggle. Then he will sense that in a universe where planets revolve around suns, and moons turn about planets, where force alone forever masters weakness, compelling it to be an obedient servant or else crushing it, there can be no special laws for man. (www.adelaideinstitute.org/Think/bush_hitler1.htm)
According to his letter of 1863 to Hooker Darwin “ truckled to public opinion & used Pentateuchal term of creation, by which he really meant "appeared" by some wholly unknown process. As Wiker observed, Some are fooled by this sop even to this day. Darwin was consistently predisposed to the origin of life being a wholly natural phenomenon. Although he insisted over and over again that there was no evidence of how the first organisms may have first appeared, he was firmly convinced it was the outcome of a natural process that had to be approached from a secular framework.
Such a view is confirmed by the fact overlooked by most critics, namely that Darwin linked in this famous sentence his hypothese of spontaneous generation of life with Newton's heliocentric scheme. By this act Darwin broke up totally with the Biblical creationism and embraced what Newton called Gentile Theology. In the early 1680s, shortly before publishing his Principia, Newton began work on a treatise, which he called the Philosophical Origins of Gentile Theology. This argued that Noah had founded the primordial religion – a Gentile Theology – which had been free of superstition and had advocated a rational worship of one God. The only commandments were love of God and love of neighbor. Pythagoras had learned about this religion and brought it to the West. Jesus had been one of these prophets sent to call mankind back to the truth, but his pure religion had been corrupted. Pythagoras became Patron Saint of the British Masonry since St. Alban, the First Grand Master.
What Newton called Gentile Theology became in the 19th century natural theology. Later the word "theology" with its "religious" association was dropped, and the subject became known as natural philosophy; later, this was changed to natural history. The ascendancy of the theory of evolution coincided with the declining public interest in natural history.
The Story behind Darwin's Warm Little Pond
Modern heliocentrism is nothing but mythological solar religion expressed in mathematical language, Galileo's Book of Nature written, in circles, triangles and so on. This religious aspect of heliocentrism is intentionally ignored by modern scientists, who are totally committed to the ideology of secularism. The notion of natural laws was always connected with the personified sun gods known under different names in different areas of the world: Shiva, Aten, Helios, Jupiter, Adonis, Surya, B aal, Wotan, and so on. The Hindu linga (phallus) was the symbol of this god and that explains an old Babylonian statute of the sun god Shemesh giving laws to Hammurabi on top of a linga. The sun god of Pharao Akhenaten's is depicted with innumerable arms touching various phenomena on the earth. Similarly are depicted the solar deities of the Aryans in India.
Speaking of heliocentrism as a secular science is a deception in the warfare of Science with Religion professed by millions of people around the world. The books of Copernicus, Kepler and Newton were written in Latin and therefore subject to interpretation by people who understood this language and were dependent for their livelihood on clerical caste which sponsored their researches for their political reasons. Reading the above quoted passage from Darwin's book in the context of the solar theology expressed in the books of heliocentrists gives it a different meaning:
In an official prayer Avalokiteshvara, who emanated from the right eye of his spiritual father, Amitabha (Spiritual Sun) is described as a puer aeternus (cp. Baby Jesus): “Generated from ten million rays, his body is completely white. His head is adorned and his locks reach down to his breast.” According to Aquinas the active part of the semen (the animal spirit) remains until the generative process is completed. This part also obtains heat from the sun, confirming the claim of Aristotle, that “man is generated by man and the sun.” Copernicus pictures the sun in The Revolutions as All Seeing Being, Visible God and mentions the stars as his “family” according to the classical defintions of the sun as Father of all. www.oneyearbibleblog.com/2008/04/april-1st-on...:
“ In the middle of all sits the sun enthroned. In this most beautiful temple could we place this luminary in any better position from which he can illuminate the whole at once? He is rightly called the Lamp, the mind, the Ruler of the Universe; Hermes Trismegistus, names him the Visible God...So the Sun sits as upon a royal throne ruling his children, the planets which circle round him. (De revolutionibus Bk. I, 10) In Egyptian mystery religion, the stars are worshipped as gods and are believed to govern the affairs of mankind.
“The sun, in the middle of the movin g stars, himself at rest and yet the source of motion, carries the image of God the Father and Creator...He distributes his motive force through a medium which contains the moving bodies even as the father creates through the Holy Ghost.” (Letter to Maestlin, 3.10.1595, in Gesammelte Werke, Vol XIII. Eds. Muenchen, 1945) In the
Religious ritual during the latest Annular Eclipse on Jan 15, 2010:
Seer Narayan Giri, who huddled in his saffron robes and a blanket at Haridwar's Har-ki-Pauri, said he spent the morning singing hymns and chanting mantra to redeem the sun god from the shadow of the moon.
"My prayers have been heard by the sun god. As clouds cleared in time, I could observe the path of eclipse in a clear sky from 11.30 a.m.," said D. Chandrika, a post-graduate student of astro-physics at Bangalore University.
Petrarch lamented the fact that in the minds of many scholars it was a sign of ignorance to prefer the Christian religion to pagan philosophy. Anticipating Darwin, Pomponazzi's pupil Porzio in his book De mente humana expressed his belief that the human soul differs in no essential point from the soul of a lion (monkey) or a plant (Cp. La Mettrie's L'Homme plant. In Pythagorean heliocentrism, the doctrine of the transmigration of soul was believed to be a fact.
The Copernican Sun as the Mind of the Universe looms behind the Intelligent Design theory which does not identify its intelligent design with a personal God of the Bible. According to one of proponents of this theory “Intelligent Design” is just the Logos theology of John's Gospel restated in the idiom of information theory.” ( Dembski). And the Logos of the gospel of John has nothing to do with the God of the Bible, who created the world in six days and rested on the seventh day. Evagelist John doesn't mention the six days of creation and doesn't mention shabbat, which was the most hated institution in the Roman Empire exploiting mercilessly the slave labor.
So the Creator, Darwin is talking about is not necessarily the God of the Bible even though he himself establishes such an understanding. In Pharaoh Akhenaten famous Hymn to the Sun we find the verses which could have influenced Darwin's image of “little, warm pond.”:
You who bring children into being in women,
and make fluid into mankind,
Who nourishes the son in the womb of his mother,
and soothes him that he weeps not,
O Nurse in the womb!
Who gives breath in order to keep alive
all that he has made;
When he comes forth from the womb on the day of
You open his mouth in speech, and give all that
The concept of the Central or Spiritual sun is known by many different names the world over.. According to Greek myths, the heart of the Central Sun beats and vibrations (Remember “good vibrations” from Beach Boys' song?) spread throughout the galaxy. This central Sun is a fountain of 'living waters,' healing 'waters' or of healing energy (the Aryan term Brahmah means 'energy'). Ancient wisdom traditions maintain humans, and all other beings in our galaxy, emanate from and share a common home: the Central Sun at the core of our Milky Way galaxy.
In a Sumerian hymn Enki stands at the empty river beds and fills them with his 'water.' Sumerian “a” means water, or semen. Let me remind in this context that the Samaritan woman misunderstood the ambiguous offer of 'living water', taking it to be fresh water when Jesus really meant the water of life. And that's, most likely, what Jesus meant by 'birth from above' or 'birth of water and the Holy Spirit.' - John 3:5. The early Christian sect of Naassenes identified Osiris with water. The Argive princess Danae was impregnated by Zeus in the guise of a golden shower (Gold was believed in ancient Egypt to be “flesh of the sun”). Recall in this context that when “one of the soldiers with a spear pierced his (Jesus') side, and forthwith came there out blood and (living) water.” (John 19:33-34) Such living water could have brought forth the living creatures. The ancient Vedic seers described the original cosmic creative process as “the churning of the milky ocean” whereby fields of subtle substance become condensed into gross matter; a view that is now widely accepted today in energy-field physics research. The Jesuit father Coyne, Director of the Vatican Observatory during John Paul II's pontificate believed the stars to be God's sperm.
Manu said, perhaps 3.000 years before the birth of Christ:
"When this world had issued out of darkness, the subtile elementary principles produced the vegetal seed which animated first the plants; from the plants, life passed into fantastical bodies which were born in the ilus of the waters; then, through a series of forms and various animals, it reached MAN."
"The first germ of life was developed by water and heat" (Manu, book i., sloka 8).
"Water ascends toward the sky in vapors; from the sun it descends in rain, from the rain are born the plants, and from the plants, animals" (book iii., sloka 76).
Heraclitus tells us one thing more about proto-men (Darwin's ape-men): they were like fish. In the version of Censorinus these fish-like creatures are identified with the first aquatic living things and adult men and women are represented as emerging in the same way as other animals, when their enclosing membranes are split.
According to Father Murphy-O’Connor of the Ecole Biblique in Jerusalem the Essene origins and, implicitly, the origins of Christianity should be traced to Babylonia during the Judean exile. There had been implanted along through the ages germs of another growth in human thinking, some of them even as early as the Babylonian period. In the Assyrian inscriptions we find recorded the Chaldeo-Babylonian idea of an evolution of the universe out of the primeval flood or "great deep," and of the animal creation out of the earth and sea. Tammuz in his original Sumerian pronounciation: Dumu-zi-abzu means faithful son of the Ocean (The Babylonian version of the little, warm pond).The Christian Church regarded the vessica piscis as a symbol of Christ, because of its fish shape, which was used by early Christians as a secret sign for Christ. Actually, the symbol of the organization was originally a fish and not the cross, indicating that the execution of Jesus was not so important at that time.
Interestingly, Darwin never explained where this “little, warm pond” came from. He didn't have to, because in the philosophical materialism matter is ever existent in the form of four elements, of which water is one. Thales of Miletus derived his world from water, like the other philosophers derived it from air, or fire. The world derived from matter is ever becoming and changing, exactly like in Darwin's evolutionism. Impermanence suggesting never ceasing transmutations is the main notion of Buddhism.
One of the early converts to Darwinism Rev. Charles Kingsley enriched Darwin's idea of natural creation with the idea of natural resurrection. Kingsley's expression "self development into other needful forms" soon found its outworkings in his book for small children tititled The Water Babies. Kingsley modified Father God from evidence of design, however, to Mother Nature, with allusions to evolution (F. Kingsley 1904, 245). The story has the child, Tom, approach Mother Carey (a synonym for Mother Nature), expecting to find her "making new beasts out of old". She explains to him that she has no need to go to that much trouble but simply has to sit and "make them make themselves" (C. Kingsley 1979, 232). This is a Kingsley' s sermon on the “gospel” according Aristotle who taught that decaying material could be transformed by the "spontaneous action of Nature" into living animals. This is philosophical rendition of the mythic idea of Phoenix reborn out of its ashes.
Shortly after the publication of The Water Babies,Kingsley was elected a Fellow of the Geological Society in 1863; he had been promoted by Lyell. His grave, is, incidentally, near Darwin's in Westminster Abbey. Still he did not sprout a spiritual body, or a water baby.
This philosophical dogma of abiogenesis was embraced by St. Augustine (Incidentally his namesake in 597. became the first Archbishop of Canterbury, a position that now heads the Church of England) who preached: "Very tiny animals result from the corruption of mortal things, arise from defects of dead bodies, or from excrements, or from putrefaction of dead bodies". Augustine's abiogenesis was, of course, inspired by the myth of Phoenix and similar teaching of St. Paul, who elaborated Kata Upanishad's verse (1,8) Like corn decays the mortal, like corn is he born again, as follows:
“Thou fool, that which thou sowest is not quickened, except it die…All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds. There are also celestial bodies, and bodies terrestrial; but the glory of the celestial is one, and the glory of the terrestrial is another…So also is the resurrection of the dead…It is sown a natural body; but it is raised a spiritual body. There is a natural body, and there is a spiritual body.” (1 Cor. 15:36-44)
In fact it may very well be that the glorified Body of Jesus Christ after the resurrection was and is his Substantial body, not his material body. Substance can be physical but not material. Presumably, in the tomb, the material body of Jesus went Quantum, became Quantum Energy, and was transformed into His Substantial Body or Quantum Body (Anthony J. Feifar, Form, Matter, Prime Matter, and Substance in Aristotle. 2007)
The same idea of natural resurrection is expressed in the Egyptian Coffin Text 330 which relates Osiris with both process and “the Order,” Mayet, the natural order of the world:
Whether I live or die I am Osiris,
I enter in and reappear through you,.
I decay in you, I grow in you...
Rev. Charles Kingsley was not the first Briton who embraced the idea of natural resurrection. Again, like Darwin, he could have pointed to Newton as his forerunner in this respect. In the paper entitled De Aere et Aethere Newton wrote:
“Just as bodies of this earth by breaking into small particles are converted into air, so these particles can be broken into lesser ones by some violent action and converted into yet more subtle air which, if it is subtle enough to penetrate the pores of the glass, crystal and other terrestrial bodies, we may call spirit of the air, or the ether. The incorporeal ether which facilitates gravitation (the Stoic hexis) is actually the body or spiritual form of Jesus Christ.”
But Catholicism taught the resurrection of the body (not just a spiritual body) as well as of the soul.
We have here what the occultists of all ages called Upward Causation as against Downward Causation starting from superior to the lower. If the higher is superior to the lower, it naturally follows that the higher is the cause of the lower, and not vice-versa. In other words, Matter is caused by Spirit, Spirit isn't caused by Matter. Man is created by God, God isn't created by Man. This is the exact opposite of the materialistic position, which sees the higher realities as the result or by-product of the lower (In the words of Manu: From Plant to Brahma, or The worm (acarus) of today is the God of tomorrow.” (Svami Vivekananda)
"Each being acquires the qualities of the one which immediately precedes it, in such a manner that the farther a being gets away from the primal atom of its series, the more he is possessed of qualities and perfections" (book i., sloka 20).
St. Paul expresssed the same idea as follows: “When the perfect comes, the imperfect will pass away (will be superseded)” – 1 Cor 13:10, which became the base of Darwin's natural Selection.Let me remind here that the London cathedral is dedicated to St. Paul
According to this materialistic version of science, physical matter, when it develops a sufficiently complex structure, produces life (organic matter). Life in turn, when it becomes sufficiently complex, produces mind and consciousness. And mind or consciousness, when it becomes sufficiently complex, through the development of philosophy and religion arrives at the idea of a First Principle, a God or Absolute Reality.
But, according to emanationist cosmology, the opposite is the case. The Absolute Reality produces through emanation universal mind, which in turn produces Life-force, which in turn condenses into matter, and eventually, living organisms. And this is Downward causation; the higher causes the lower. Because of this, each higher principle is the Creator and Origin of the hypostasis immediately below it. So we can refer to “the branch and the root”, each higher stage being the “root” of the one it generates. Simply put, St. Paul was a kabbalist, maybe like Madonna (51), who is now planning a baby with her loverboy Jesus (22) Interestingly, the Jews called the Christians notsrim i.e. Branches*. And the Arabs to this day call them nasrani lit. little fishes.
*The Greeks originally had no word for matter in general, as opposed to raw material suitable for some specific purpose or other, so Aristotle adopted the word for lumber (hyle) for this purpose. The idea that everything physical is made of the same basic substance holds up well under modern science, although it may be thought of more in terms of energy or matter/energy. The French philosopher La Mettrie wrote a book titled L'homme plant. Hylozoism is the doctrine according to which all matter possesses life. It is a poetical view of the world. In the 19th century, hylozoism had been revived by some thinkers as a postulate of science. Literally taken, it would be materialism, and in that sense is indefatigably advocated by E. Haeckel, who identifies mind with organization and life, and life with energy, which he makes a property of the atoms (the so-called “cold fusion” was to prove that even cold atoms possess energy). Matter is for him the only reality.
– Stephen Jay Gould, in his Ontogeny and Philogeny (1977) wrote: “Haeckel's evolutionary racism; his call to the German people for racial purity and unflinching devotion to a “just” state; his belief that harsh, inexorable, laws of evolution ruled human civilization and nature alike, conferring upon favored races the right to dominate others; the irrational mysticisam that had always stood in strange communion with his grave words about objective science – contributed to the rise of Nazism.” Now you better understand why Jews are not allowed to settle in Judea and Samaria. They “pollute” the racially pure Palestinians, who are believed to be descendents of the Aryan Philistines, or Greeks.
Jesus vs. Logos
Saint Irenaeus (Greek: Ειρηναίος was(2nd century AD - c. 202 AD) Bishop of Lugdunum in Gaul, Roman Empire (now Lyons, France). He was an early church father and apologist, and his writings were formative in the early development of Christian theology. He was a disciple of Saint Polycarp, who was said to be a disciple of Saint John the Evangelist.
But unlike John who introduced to his gospel the philosophical demiurge (Logos), Irenaus preferred to speak of the Son and the Spirit as the "hands of God". The world has been intentionally designed by God, not by Logos as the ID proclaims.
In addition to reversing the wrongs done by Adam, Irenaeus thinks of Christ as "recapitulating" or "summing up" human life.This means that Christ goes through every stage of human life, from infancy to old age, and simply by living it, sanctifies it with his divinity. Irenaeus argues that Christ did not die until he was older than conventionally portrayed. Fighting this teaching Haeckel proclaimed his dogma: "Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny." This slogan represented his belief that in the course of its development, a human embryo first resembles a fish, in later weeks a salamander, then it passes through the reptilian and mammalian stages before "evolving" into a recognizable human being. The evolutionists hate the Jewish Jesus defending the Torah.
Ireenaeus' theology can be better understood in the context of Clement's letter to the Corinthian church, which is one of the oldest Christian documents still in existence outside the New Testament.
Saint Clement I, also known as Pope Clement I, Saint Clement of Rome, or Clemens Romanus, was the fourth Pope and Bishop of Rome and is considered the first Apostolic Father of the early Christian church. There are only two extant Greek texts of 1 Clement. The oldest is in Codex Alexandrinus, which dates to the 5th century.
"When it (the phoenix) has lived 500 years, it builds itself a nest in the branches of an oak. In this it collects spices, and of these materials builds a pile on which it deposits itself, and dying, breathes out its last breath. From the body of the parent bird, a young Phoenix issues forth. When this has grown up, it lifts its nest from the tree and caries it to the city of Heliopolis in Egypt and deposits it in the Temple of the Sun." - Ovid in his Metamorphoses In the apocryphal document known as The Ltter of Benan, Jesus was raised in the Temple of the Sun in Heliopolis (On)
Pope Clement, a Darwinist before Darwin
"Let us understand, dearly beloved, how the Master continually showeth unto us the resurrection that shall be hereafter ...
Let us consider the marvellous sign which is seen in the regions of the east, that is, in the parts about Arabia.
There is a bird, which is named the phoenix. This, being the only one of its kind, liveth for five hundred years; and when it hath now reached the time of its dissolution that it should die, it maketh for itself a coffin of frankincense and myrrh and the other spices, into the which in the fulness of time it entereth, and so it dieth.
But, as the flesh rotteth, a certain worm is engendered (Recall Aristotle and Augustine!-rp), which is nurtured from the moisture of the dead creature and putteth forth wings. Then, when it is grown lusty, it taketh up that coffin where are the bones of its parent, and carrying them journeyeth from the country of Arabia even unto Egypt, to the place called the City of the Sun; and in the day time in the sight of all, flying to the altar of the Sun, it layeth them thereupon; and this done, it setteth forth to return. So the priests examine the registers of the times, and they find that it hath come when the five hundredth year is completed.
Do we then think it to be a great and marvelous thing, if the Creator of the universe shall bring about the resurrection of them that have served Him with holiness in the assurance of a good faith, seeing that He showeth to us even by a bird the magnificence of His promise?" Please note, he did not mention the resurrection of Jesus as the proof of resurrection, but that of the mythic bird! Well, the early Roman art doesn't depict Jesus as a Jewish Teacher, but as Helios or Apollo driving the sun chariot.
– The Epistle of St Clement to the Corinthians
According to Tertullian (Demurrer Against the Heretics 36 and 32:2) Clement was ordained by Peter.
In the Gnostic document entitled Revelation on Pistis Sophia, the Phoenx, which periodically puts itself to death and resurrects, is said to have been created as a witness for the iniquitous judgment passed upon Adam by the Archons. (Jean Doresse, The Secret Booksa of the Egyptian Gnostics.1986, p.169). In the mythology of New Age these Archons are called the White Brotherhood of Himalaya.
Tha Acta Diurnia or “daily gazette” chronicled events both momentous and trivial in Rome and the empire. Pliny drew on the acta for a number of the oddities he records in his Natural History. Some events reported in the Acta were too far-fetched even for the credulous Pliny to swallow, however, and he treats them with caution. The reputed sightings of a phoenix was one of these. (www.com.washington.edu/program/c)
John Paul II following in the footsteps of Clement
On Feb. 9, 1989, A. Sakharov traveled to Italy where he spent more than an hour in private audience with the Pope John Paul II and received an honorary doctorate in astronomy from the University of Bologna. Rector of the University said on this occasion: “Not by chance has he (Sakharov) been placed in the company of Copernicus, of Galileo and of Giordano Bruno. Not by chance is the book chosen for the laureation of A. Sakharov The Dialogue of the Two Greatest Systems by Galileo: a choice meant to recall the spirit of liberty…” Or I would say, license to kill the remaining Jews...
The phoenix-like character of matter reborn from its “ashes”was “proved” by the Soviet physicist A. Sakharov in his dogma of the “solar phoenix”, or strictly materialistic principle of the “spontaneous resurrection of energy (Brahma) such as takes place in the sun's core.” And this scientific dogma explains the strange Latin expression "resurrexit” (“he has risen again”) which in nonscriptural references is used almost invariably and surrectio (“risen”) hardly ever. Resurrectio suggest natural process repeating itself time and again and not a historical fact as exemplified by the risen Jesus. The term resurrectio mirrors Plato’s cosmology which was cyclic, with periodic destruction and recreation (Big Bang's expansions and contractions) of the universe in conjunction with various astronomical events, like the birth of a star and of a Jesus. Sakharov wanted to undo Patriarch Nikon’s reform who in the 17th century dropped the part of the phrase concerning sanctification “by the Holy Spirit and by fire” because “fire” did not have sufficient textual warrant, and this offended those who believed that the Holy Sprit was Himself fire according to the Aryan dogma. According to the Chinese Zen master Hogen, Buddha is “Hei-tei-dji Rai-gu-ka” (“the deity of fire who seeks fire”). In was the Buddha who sat on Apostles' heads in the shape of the cloven tongues of fire!
Following the lead of Pope John Paul II, as expressed in his book Crossing the Threshold of Hope, two British authors in their The Jesus Mysteries. Was the ‘Original Jesus’ a Pagan God? (1999) discovered that even Jesus’ teachings were not original, but had been anticipated by the pagan sages. They are in effect saying that Jesus was a Pagan god and that Christianity was a heretical product of paganism. In their opinion, this theory explains the similarities between the stories of Osiris-Dionysus and Jesus Christ. They argue: “Pagan civilization built vast libraries to house hundreds of thousands of works of literary and scientific genius. Its natural philosophers speculated that human beings had evolved from animals. Its astronomers knew that the earth was a sphere, which, along with the planets, revolves around the sun…”
Pauline Christianity turned Great Britain into a Judenrein country; Jews were not allowed to British Isles until Cromwell. Since philosophical evolutionism was smuggled into KJV, evolution became the religious component of the Anglican confession and that explains Darwin's burial at the Westminster Abbey side by side with Newton.
Adrian Desmond, in his Huxley. From Devil's Disciple to Evolution's High Priest. Observed: “Huxley separated Jesus' Nazarene beliefs from the later Christianity fashioned by Paul. Here is the leitmotif of his Natural History of Christianity, if he could write it CHRIST NO CHRISTIAN! The Pauline religion which 'coalesced with the state in the 4th century...is Alexandrian Judaism and Neoplatonist mystigogy.' mixed with 'much of the old idolatry,' and its success owed little to 'the truth' or falsity of the story of Jesus.” And, of course, Newton who turned Jesus into a brain dead gravity was ever present with Huxley as he was with darwin.
Once a visitor chanced on Huxley and Joyce, lying on the floor, moving planetary pellets of paper around a large screwed-up ball of a Sun... There was grandeur in this childish play too.
In the Qumran manuscripts Paul is described as "the Lying adversary," and the "Lying Spouter" who "rejects the Law in the midst of the whole congregation", "the Tongue" and the "Scoffer/Comedian" who "poured over Israel the waters of lying." Paul decreed the everlasting destruction of the whole fabric of the Mosaic Law,
The following excerpt from the book, "The Dead Sea Scrolls Deception" (Corgi Books, London, 1991) by Michael Baigent and Richard Leigh raises doubts as to the legitimacy of Paul's role within the early church:
"... Paul is in effect the first Christian heretic, and his teachings, which become the foundation of later Christianity, are a flagrant deviation from the 'Original' or 'pure' form extolled by the leadership. Whether James, the 'Lord's brother,' was literally Jesus' blood kin or not (and everything suggests he was), it is clear that he knew Jesus...personally. So did most of the other members of the community or 'early Church,' in Jerusalem, including of course, Peter. When they spoke, they did so with first hand authority. Paul had never had such personal aquaintance with the figure he'd begun to regard as his 'Saviour.' He had only his quasi-mystical experience in the desert and the sound of a disembodied voice. For him to arrogate authority to himself on this basis is, to say the least, presumptuous. It also leads him to distort Jesus' teachings beyond recognition, to formulate, in fact, his own highly individual and idiosyncratic theology, and then to legitimise it by spuriously ascribing it to Jesus."
This teaching about immortality of the soul is contrary to the basic doctrine of the Hebrew Bible. Truly, unless we read the "Old Testament" kabalistically, it is very little we can learn from it as regards the soul's immortality. The common people among Hebrews had not the slightest idea of soul and spirit, and made no difference between life, blood, and soul, calling the latter the "breath of life." And King James's translators have made such a jumble of it that no one but a kabalist can restore the Bible to its original form. Out of the forty-seven translators of King James I of England’s Bible only three understood Hebrew, and of these two died before the Psalms were translated. The British elites do not condescend to learn the language of the Hebrew slaves, but sometimes the king condescended to eat with the beggars.
Charles Darwin's theory might explain the size of bird beaks on the Galapagos islands but not major evolutionary changes such as the origin of feathered animals. So concluded a conference of 160 biologists that was held at the Field Museum of Natural History in Chicago back in 1980. In the same year the famous evolutionary biologist Stephen J. Gould declared Perhaps we [colleagues] should all lie low and rally round the flag of strict Darwinism, at least for the moment --a kind of old-time religion on our part.